Unfortunately, the MRIQuestions.com forum became unmanageable due to spam attacks. I recommend an alternative resource: www.imagingQA.com
How to reconcile 2 points of view about frequency encoding? - Printable Version

+- Unfortunately, the MRIQuestions.com forum became unmanageable due to spam attacks. I recommend an alternative resource: www.imagingQA.com (http://mriquestions.com/forum)
+-- Forum: Making an Image (/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Forum: Frequency and Phase Encoding (/forumdisplay.php?fid=24)
+--- Thread: How to reconcile 2 points of view about frequency encoding? (/showthread.php?tid=10255)



How to reconcile 2 points of view about frequency encoding? - Elad P - 02-26-2017 10:51 PM

Hi,

After reading the questions/answers about making an image and also viewing the videos of Prof. Paul Callaghan (referenced in this site) I'm a bit confused on how to interpret frequency encoding.

1) On the one hand, it seems that reading a single while applying the gradient along the x-axis (the frequency encoding axis) should give us the x positions (from their linear relation to the precession frequency). So a FT on the acquired signal (a line in the k-space) should give us the positions.

2) On the other hand, while acquiring the said signal, the phase unwind/rewind like a helix so the different frequencies in the acquired signal relate to the distance between full turns of the phase helix

When we interpret the results of the FT on a k-space line, do we get frequencies that correspond to the absolute position (option 1 above) or the distance between phase turns (options 2)?
How can I make sense of this?

Thank you