09-04-2015, 10:34 PM
Why is there a "bump" in the molecular tumbling rate v T2 relaxation positive?
i.e. if T1 in T2 means that enhanced longitudinal recovery (T1) results in loss of transverse magnetization (T2) ...then when T1 was at a minimum (larmor frequency) wouldnt that "enhanced T1 recovery" have resulted in a "dip" in T2 (greater loss of transverse mag) rather than a bump upwards?
I hope my question makes sense and someone can easily answer. Thank you!
i.e. if T1 in T2 means that enhanced longitudinal recovery (T1) results in loss of transverse magnetization (T2) ...then when T1 was at a minimum (larmor frequency) wouldnt that "enhanced T1 recovery" have resulted in a "dip" in T2 (greater loss of transverse mag) rather than a bump upwards?
I hope my question makes sense and someone can easily answer. Thank you!